Policies and Guidelines

2023-24 SCARD Fellowship Embargo Guidelines

SCARD is pleased to announce the continuation of our fellowship embargo program. The program has been extremely successful in meeting its objectives of improving the fairness of the fellowship application process and providing our residents more time to experience all of Radiology sub-specialties before choosing their future career. In order to maintain flexibility, sub-specialties can either utilize the match or comply with the embargo dates. Based on feedback from many of you, we have made some significant changes to our guidelines, particularly regarding the first date of interviews. Below are the guidelines for this coming year (2023-24).

  1. Interviews- All interviews should be virtual.

  2. No onsite visits should be made by candidates.

  3. Dates-Offers can be made on the day of the interview but programs cannot send out more offers than they have spots to fill.

    1. November 1 – First day to accept applications

    2. November 1  – Open house webinars can begin

    3. January 8  – First day of interviews

    4. March 31 – Last day of interviews.

  4. Applicants have until Jan 15th to accept or decline any offer made before Jan 15th. For any offer made on or after Jan 15th the candidate has a 1 day grace period to accept or decline the offer).

  5. Exceptions to the embargo:Specialties that have the Match should participate for all external candidates and are strongly encouraged to participate for internal candidates as well. If a program chooses not to participate in a match for an external applicant, no offer to a candidate can be made until 12 weeks prior to the match date.

    1. Applicants whose spouse/domestic partner is also applying for a medical fellowship in the same year.    

    2. Internal candidates

    3. Military candidates.

    4. International candidates – international candidates are defined as applicants from programs that are neither ACGME or RCPS programs(i.e. Canadian applicants are NOT excluded from the embargo.)

  6. Neuro-interventional programs are excluded from this proposal as many are not under the direction of Radiology

  7. Onsite second visits are allowed. However, all programs should reassure candidates that the second visit is optional and is not being used by the programs as a de-facto second interview but purely to allow the applicant to get a better feel and understanding of their program. Second visits should not be used by the program to influence their rank list. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that no onsite visits are scheduled until after the program has prepared their final rank list which they agree not to change based on the second visit.

  8. Programs should not make an offer to or accept any applicant that has already accepted an offer from another program.

 

To summarize the important dates for both match and non-match programs:

  1. For sub-specialties that participate in the match:

Match Programs

Timeline

Important Dates

Applications

Applications may be accepted beginning

November 1, 2023

Interview Embargo Dates

Interviews may begin

January 8, 2023

Interviews completed

March 31, 2024

NRMP Dates

Match Day

To be determined by the NRMP

 

  1. For sub-specialties that do not participate in the match:

Non Match Programs

Timeline

Important Dates

Applications

Applications may be accepted beginning

November 1, 2023

Interview Embargo Dates

Interviews may begin

January 8, 2024

Interviews completed

March 31, 2024

Acceptance Embargo Date

No fellowship may offer acceptances before this date

January 8, 2024

Grace Period

Applicants have until Jan 15th to accept or decline any offer made before Jan 15th. For any offer made after Jan 15th the candidate has a 1 day grace period to accept or decline the offer.

 

 

This proposal is supported by the Association of Program Directors in Radiology, the Association of Program Directors in Interventional Radiology, the Society of Skeletal Radiology, the Society of Thoracic Radiology, the American Society of Emergency Radiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, the Society of Breast Imaging, the Society of Interventional Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology, and the Society of Abdominal Radiology. 

SCARD believes it is critical for all fellowship programs to follow these guidelines and we ask all Chairs to ensure that their departments follow this proposal unless they notify SCARD that they are opting out.

 

Suggested Guidelines for Radiology Fellowship Applicant Second Visits

These guidelines apply to radiology fellowships that participate in the Match.

The COVID pandemic has altered the way in which interviews for residencies and fellowships have long been conducted.  The move to virtual interviews has positive and negative implications.  On the positive side, the virtual interviews allow a more standardized experience for the candidates, a decrease in cost for both candidates and programs, and a decrease in amount of time away from their current training and/or school (i.e. less time traveling and being off service).  On the negative side, the lack of candidates getting to personally view a program and the location can make deciding on a new location difficult and for programs the lack of having the candidate visit can make recruitment more difficult.

However, even before the pandemic the concern of inequity in the ability of candidates to travel to potential locations was being discussed.  This inequity was related to both the costs of traveling and also to various institutional policies related to time off to travel to interviews.  Foremost of concern with a mix of virtual and in-person interviews is that there will be inherent bias in having some candidates do virtual interviews and others do in-person interviews. This concern also exists with optional second visits. 

Note that although some programs may consider that allowing candidates to visit and talk with current fellows and residents while not contacting or interacting with program leadership is sufficient to assure candidates that the visit is not being used as a de facto ‘interview,’ there is concern among many that candidates will believe that the interactions with residents and fellows is somehow being used to assess and rank the candidate. It has often been said to candidates that  any interaction with the program should be considered as part of the program’s assessment of the candidate.  It is very hard to eliminate that perception by candidates and thus they may be hesitant to visit a program or feel that it is vitally important to visit in order to have a chance at getting highly ranked.

Each program should consider how they can reassure applicants that a second visit is truly optional and will not be used in determining their rank list. Setting up a transparent process for assessing and ranking candidates that reduces these biases (or at least the perception of bias) is important.  

One possible solution that programs may choose to use is as follows: 

  1. All candidates chosen for interview are interviewed virtually.
  2. A date after the interviews is set and advertised to candidates as the time when ranking will occur by the program and that interactions with the candidates after this date will have no impact on ranking.
  3. A date or dates (program visitation day/s) after the ‘ranking date’ is set to allow candidates to freely visit the site and program to assess the program from their standpoint prior to the candidates developing their rank list.  This can also serve as a recruitment activity by the programs.
  4. To more fully assure candidates that rank list will not be altered by their attendance or lack of attendance at the program visitation day, the local GME office can monitor the rank list and oversee any changes to the list after the published program ‘ranking date’.
 


Whatever solution is chosen by each program, all programs should reassure candidates that the second visit is optional and is not being used by the programs as a de-facto second interview but purely to allow the applicant to get a better feel and understanding of their program.


January 2023 

 

SCARD STATEMENT OF PROFESSIONALISM

We, the members of SCARD, believe that every member of our many organizations should be valued and feel included. All voices should be heard.

To assure a collaborative and inclusive culture, radiologists, interventional radiologists, radiation oncologists, and medical physicists should conduct themselves in a professional manner, respecting all individuals, including patients and colleagues, and advocate for those who cannot advocate for themselves. We welcome all members. We shall not discriminate based on race, color, national origin, language, religion, marital or parental status, age, citizenship, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or disability.

While we embrace free speech and the power of open discourse and debate during our professional society meetings and on social media platforms, we do not condone any forms of harassment, bullying behaviors, or speech that marginalizes or attacks others.

By upholding this endorsed Statement of Professionalism, we promise to treat each human being with steadfast dignity, kindness and respect at all times so that our central mission remains focused on providing exceptional, compassionate care for all.

Code of Conduct, Adopted (10/2019) 

 

SCARD FALL MEETING ATTENDANCE POLICY

In order to preserve the purpose, goals, and nature of engagement in the SCARD annual Fall Meeting, attendance shall be limited to radiology department chairs who are members or who are eligible for membership, in addition to their radiology department senior business officer. 

Radiology vice-chairs and other faculty are invited to attend the SCARD Leadership and Management Course and SCARD programming at AAR. 

Approved October, 2019 

 

SCARD STATEMENT ON PAID PARENTAL LEAVE

The Society of Chairs of Academic Radiology Departments (SCARD), as stated in our bylaws, advances the art and science of radiology by the development of policies and initiatives essential for the success of the clinical, research and educational missions of radiology and imaging sciences 1. Faculty wellbeing and diversity with inclusion are necessary for this success. Supported parental leave is not only about health and wellness, it also about equity and creation of an inclusive environment. It is recognized that there are alternative family structures beyond the traditional mother as the primary caregiver, and our policies must support this. Moreover, if we as leaders truly intend to address and eradicate inequities, we must adopt more inclusive policies. SCARD members support the American Association for Women Radiologists and pledge to strive for departmental, institutional, and organizational change that provides 12 weeks of paid parental leave for eligible* faculty members of all genders.

*Defined per the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA).

  1. Society of Chairs of Academic Radiology Departments Bylaws. Accessed October, 2018. https://scard.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/About/2012-bylaws.pdf);

 

POLICY FOR ACCESS TO THE SCARD MAILING/EMAIL LIST


MAILING LIST USE

  • Members may use the SCARD mailing list at no charge, to send information that will be of interest and use to the members. Examples:
    • Announce availability of faculty positions
    • Announce availability of fellowship positions
    • Send not-for-profit meeting announcements
    • Conduct surveys
    • Requests for help           
  • Members may use the SCARD mailing list at cost of $275.00, to send information that will be of interest and use to the members but from which the member may receive a profit. Examples: 
    • Announce publication of textbook
    • Announce a for-profit meeting/course
  • Non-members may not use the SCARD mailing list.
  • In recognition of the purposes shared with SCARD, upon approval, these organizations may have access to the SCARD Mailing list at no charge: NIH, ACR, ACRIN, the Academy of Radiology Research and AAR and its related organizations.
  • Other organizations may submit a written request, including samples of the item to be mailed, to the SCARD office. If approved, the cost is $275.00 for one-time use of the SCARD membership list.

  • Submitting a survey for approval and distribution to SCARD members indicates the applicant’s agreement to post results for a survey to the Members Only section of SCARD’s website.

All requests to use the mail list are reviewed by the President prior to distribution of message. 

 

 

E-MAIL LIST USE

  • Members may use the SCARD e-mail list at no charge, to send information that will be of interest and use to the members. Examples:
    • Announce availability of faculty positions
    • Announce availability of fellowship positions
    • Send not-for-profit meeting announcements
    • Conduct surveys
    • Requests for help
  • In recognition of the purposes shared with SCARD, upon approval, these organizations may have access to the SCARD email list at no charge: NIH, ACR, ACRIN, the Academy of Radiology Research and AAR and its related organizations.

  • Non-Members may not use the SCARD e-mail list
  • Submitting a survey for approval and distribution to SCARD members indicates agreement to post the survey’s results to the Members Only section of SCARD’s website.

All requests to use the email list are reviewed by the President prior to distribution of message. 

 

Updated October 2020